Assaying, Microscopy, Mineralogy & XRF/XRD

Assaying, Microscopy, Mineralogy & XRF/XRD 2017-04-04T06:57:57+00:00
  • To participate in the 911Metallurgist Forums, be sure to JOINLOGIN
  • Use Add New Topic to ask a New Question/Discussion about Assaying, Microscopy, Mineralogy & XRF/XRD.
  • OR Select a Topic that Interests you.
  • Use Add Reply = to Reply/Participate in a Topic/Discussion (most frequent).
    Using Add Reply allows you to Attach Images or PDF files and provide a more complete input.
  • Use Add Comment = to comment on someone else’s Reply in an already active Topic/Discussion.

Minerals determination with X-Rays diffraction XRD (4 replies)

JohnnyD
2 years ago
JohnnyD 2 years ago

Different heavy sand placers are mainly composed with Iimenite, Zircon, Rutile Monazite and Xenotime. On all X-rays diffraction patterns, I still have high intensity “d-spacing” 2,34 - 1,65 - 1,48. which don't correspond to the here above minerals. Anyone can help or advise ? Has an XRD ever been good for you to do Mineral determination?

David Kano
2 years ago
David Kano 2 years ago

Check for alteration inclusions such as oxyhydroxides & boehmite.

JohnnyD
2 years ago
JohnnyD 2 years ago

Thanks for your advise.  It seems the "unknown peaks" were the results of the overlapping of minor peaks.

Maya Rothman
2 years ago
Maya Rothman 2 years ago

In case of multiple phases, and if you know most of them, I would be quite confident doing a Rietveld refinement of your XRD. Is that what you did? If not, how did you get your conclusion?

JohnnyD
2 years ago
JohnnyD 2 years ago

No, I didn't perform Rietveld refinement. I followed an XRD specialist who wrote :
"Peak height can be misleading as it can change depending on crystal shape and preferred orientation of the sample during sample preparation.
The peak at 38.5 appears to be a combination of reflections from zircon and monazite. Both zircon and monazite have 'minor' peaks at these locations that have combined to give a larger peak. The peak at 55.55 is a zircon peak combined with ilmenite peak .The peak at 62.90 is a minor zircon peak probably enhanced by a minor monazite peak and probably rutile too. " Above that, the chemicals analysis confirmed these conclusions. Thank you for your advise

Please join and login to participate and leave a comment.

 

BUY Laboratory & Small Plant Process Equipment

We have all the laboratory and plant equipment you need to test or build/operate your plant.

ENTER our Mining Equipment' Store

We Sell EQUIPMENT for all types of Mineral Treatment PROCESSES and Laboratory Testing needs

Have a Mineral Processing QUESTION?

Come in, ask your question

911Metallurgist Community Forums

Talk to other metallurgists and be helped.

Need ENGINEERING Services or Plant TROUBLESHOOTING?

We can IMPROVE ALL PLANTS / Mineral Processing Engineering & LABORATORY Ore Testing

911Metallurgy Engineering

Contact us for process engineering, metallurgical investigations, plant optimization, plant troubleshooting, needs. WE “FIX” METALLURGY.