Geology & GeoMetallurgy

Geology & GeoMetallurgy 2017-03-23T09:44:23+00:00
  • To participate in the 911Metallurgist Forums, be sure to JOINLOGIN
  • Use Add New Topic to ask a New Question/Discussion about Geology and Geometallurgy.
  • OR Select a Topic that Interests you.
  • Use Add Reply = to Reply/Participate in a Topic/Discussion (most frequent).
    Using Add Reply allows you to Attach Images or PDF files and provide a more complete input.
  • Use Add Comment = to comment on someone else’s Reply in an already active Topic/Discussion.

Pyrite Reactivity (6 replies)

Tony Verdeschi
1 year ago
Tony Verdeschi 1 year ago

Does any one know the reactivity of three pyrite generations: Syn- to post sedimentary during gold cyanidation (lab leach columns)

Between 3 main generations of pyrite: Compact pyrite (single crystal), Porous pyrite (reworked concretionary pyrite) & Euhedral pyrite (hydrothermal) which one one is most likely to be more reactive during gold cyanidation?

Victor Bergman
1 year ago
Victor Bergman 1 year ago

Most likely this is site dependent or deposit dependent as trace element content, crystallinity, grain size, degree of oxidation, gangue mineralogy etc will also influence the result. In general a porous pyrite would be more reactive (more surface area, less organized solid) than a euhedral crystal and single pyrite crystals are more likely to be insulated from reaction by gangue than say pyrite concretions where pyrites are connected and on oxidation can transfer electrons thus adding to the chemical oxidation of associated sulfides.

Tony Verdeschi
1 year ago
Tony Verdeschi 1 year ago

Thanks for the reply (very informative). It is a non oxidised gold ore sourced from the Witwatersrand Basin (South Africa). If you have more information on the subject,  I'm busy running more lab test work on this ore and mineralogical characterisation showed the presence of this three generations of pyrite of which I haven't found any literature that describe their reactivity. Thank again

Bob Mathias
1 year ago
Bob Mathias 1 year ago

I think the porous pyrite should be more reactive due to the increased contact surface does get to the gold cyanidation in comparison with the other two types.

Bill Fraser
1 year ago
Bill Fraser 1 year ago

I agree. As long as there is no outside or contamination of other minerals/elements, the more anhedral or "spongy" the pyrite, the more reactive it is during cyanidation. Euhedral pyrite is typically harder to leach. Surface area also plays an important part of the cyanidation.

JohnnyD
1 year ago
JohnnyD 1 year ago

What is the ratio of contained gold within each of the 3 generations of pyrite? Are silver or electrum present in the metallurgy? The % recovery of gold will be significantly determined in the lab leach tests by the above and other gangue mineralogy as advised earlier. Have you completed a gold deportment study?

Tony Verdeschi
1 year ago
Tony Verdeschi 1 year ago

The porous/spongy pyrite contains more gold grains locked within it (100% locked in sulphide), compact pyrite is the second gold host (associated with poly-mineral boundary) and euhedral pyrite the least (gold occurring in boundary between it and silicates and to some extent occluded on it). Quartz contribute 70% of the mineral composition, Mica(14%), chlorite (7%) and Fe-sulphides (4%). dominant gold host is the fe-sulphide bearing minerals and matrix silicates. For this ore, gold occurs as native and there's hardly an electrum component on it.

Please join and login to participate and leave a comment.