Laboratory Testing & General Mineral Processing Engineering

Laboratory Testing & General Mineral Processing Engineering2017-04-04T06:57:51+00:00
  • To participate in the 911Metallurgist Forums, be sure to JOINLOGIN
  • Use Add New Topic to ask a New Question/Discussion about Mineral Processing or Laboratory Work.
  • OR Select a Topic that Interests you.
  • Use Add Reply = to Reply/Participate in a Topic/Discussion (most frequent).
    Using Add Reply allows you to Attach Images or PDF files and provide a more complete input.
  • Use Add Comment = to comment on someone else’s Reply in an already active Topic/Discussion.

Separate Al of different thickness and shape (6 replies and 3 comments)

SaveMetals
6 months ago
SaveMetals 6 months ago

Hello All, 

I am trying to separate two different aluminum alloys in scrap that I'm processing where one alloy is significantly more pure (higher value) than the other. At the moment I'm thinking of trying to rod mill to reduce the size of one fraction without affecting the other, but I'm wondering a)if this is realistic what types of rods can I use/what calculations for processing parameters need to be done and b) whether there is a better technology ofr solution for this problem.

$$$ material = Aluminum, 2-3mm thickness originally now curled into balls, dense

$ material = Aluminum, <1mm easily torn by hand if single piece but in crumpled more compact pieces now, oblong to ball like shape, feels less dense.

What I imagine is a rod mill to tear the $ material into smaller pieces but not sure how to determine impact other than through experimenting which will not affect the $$$ material or only minimally effect it (bend and dent but not break). Would like to know method for calculating the size and mass of rods.

Any suggestions appreciated.

Yves
6 months ago
Yves 6 months ago

What about using a hammer mill. I think you will get more brakeage. You can use a 5mm screen below

Alex Doll
6 months ago
Alex Doll 6 months ago

Probably not a great application for a rod mill.  But if you really want to go down that route, here is the Bible you need to study (use your professional association membership to access the document):

http://www.onemine.org/document/abstract.cfm?docid=30132 

denverphil
6 months ago
denverphil 6 months ago

I would think the easiest approach is to "waterfall" off an elevated conveyor discharge and a blower in the direction of the conveyor discharge.  Usually put up a wall so that the most dense falls behind wall and least dense flies over wall.  Fast and cheap

denverphil
6 months ago

May need to 'pre-screen' first to get size fractions blown to be more nearly same size

Robert
6 months ago
Robert 6 months ago

Another consideration - how pure does the pure fraction need to be in order to demand a premium? If high purity is required you may need to accept a lower yield in separation.  

Todd H
6 months ago
Todd H 6 months ago

I think denverphil has the right idea, i would use a sorting technology that exploits a dissimilar characteristic

SG, Color, Emission (XRF)

Ore sorting can use any method of separation provided it is fairly unique to one or the other. see this link - https://www.tomra.com/en/sorting/mining

It all costs money!

Todd

Todd Harvey - Global Resource Engineering http://www.global-resource-eng.com

SaveMetals
6 months ago
SaveMetals 6 months ago

Yves, I thought about a turbomill (similar idea to hammer mill) but they are expensive -small budget here. As are color sorters, (very expensive!) and any sort of air puff classification system even though color would work well here. 

Alex Doll thanks for the helpful links, unfortunately I do not have a membership where I can view the long document but can try to ask around.

Denverphil I also like your idea, will try it out. Unfortunately the density difference between these material types seems smaller than the stiffness difference in this particular case, but worth a shot.

denverphil
6 months ago

It is not the density (sp gr) difference I'm referring to, it is the "apparent density". You said one "feels less dense". Therefore, it should blow further. Assuming similar particle size and constant cross-sectional velocity of the air. (curtains and distribute air flow so it is essentially equal across width of conveyor discharge. This is an 'air knife' application and you should not overload the conveyor so as to impede air flow. To get a feel for it, I would drop some hand sorted pieces in front of a fan and see where they land. Usually a hurdle wall is placed so as to lose a bit of the higher value product to the lower value stream. For a conveyor you can use a treadmill for testing. Cheap enough I hope.

denverphil
6 months ago

Oops, could blow less far if surface area high. It doesn't really matter so long as one goes further.

Please join and login to participate and leave a comment.

BUY Laboratory & Small Plant Process Equipment

We have all the laboratory and plant equipment you need to test or build/operate your plant.

ENTER our Mining Equipment' Store

We Sell EQUIPMENT for all types of Mineral Treatment PROCESSES and Laboratory Testing needs

Do you need METALLURGICAL TESTING of your ORE?

View the Services we Provide

911Metallurgist Mineral Processing & Process Development Laboratory

We have a metallurgical test for every possible mineral type and treatment.

Need ENGINEERING Services or Plant TROUBLESHOOTING?

We can IMPROVE ALL PLANTS / Mineral Processing Engineering & LABORATORY Ore Testing

911Metallurgy Engineering

Contact us for process engineering, metallurgical investigations, plant optimization, plant troubleshooting, needs. WE “FIX” METALLURGY.

I Need Consulting Engineering Help
I Need Ore Laboratory Testing